<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Automation a Good Idea?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/</link>
	<description>SEO, environmental issues and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:55:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: faydaliweb</title>
		<link>http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/comment-page-2/#comment-464362</link>
		<dc:creator>faydaliweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 16:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/?p=568#comment-464362</guid>
		<description>may be good but if you post more content in a day it can flagged with spam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>may be good but if you post more content in a day it can flagged with spam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/comment-page-2/#comment-462818</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/?p=568#comment-462818</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t use twollow, they usually suggest spam followers even though they&#039;re style of delivering followers is good compared to others. They mostly recommend bad followers... use manual way of adding instead</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t use twollow, they usually suggest spam followers even though they&#8217;re style of delivering followers is good compared to others. They mostly recommend bad followers&#8230; use manual way of adding instead</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brodie</title>
		<link>http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/comment-page-2/#comment-462165</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brodie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 00:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/?p=568#comment-462165</guid>
		<description>Automation of sorts is OK with me.

Scheduling tweets to go out when your followers are more likely to be on line.
Finding good people to follow based on interests etc.
Tweeting your blog posts (although I prefer to tweet directly with better copy on the tweet than just a generic message)

But spam is getting out of control. It seems unstoppable - even blocking doesn&#039;t deter them.

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automation of sorts is OK with me.</p>
<p>Scheduling tweets to go out when your followers are more likely to be on line.<br />
Finding good people to follow based on interests etc.<br />
Tweeting your blog posts (although I prefer to tweet directly with better copy on the tweet than just a generic message)</p>
<p>But spam is getting out of control. It seems unstoppable &#8211; even blocking doesn&#8217;t deter them.</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/comment-page-2/#comment-461947</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/?p=568#comment-461947</guid>
		<description>I use twitterfeed and tweetlater. I also found that it&#039;s very impportant to continue to tweet manually to give your followers some original content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use twitterfeed and tweetlater. I also found that it&#8217;s very impportant to continue to tweet manually to give your followers some original content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaroslav</title>
		<link>http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/2009/07/03/twitter-automation/comment-page-2/#comment-461649</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaroslav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixelheadonline.com/blog/?p=568#comment-461649</guid>
		<description>Automated twitter isn&#039;t good idea because people are not interested in reading robot-written text without human touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automated twitter isn&#8217;t good idea because people are not interested in reading robot-written text without human touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
